Sozialdarwinismus, gibt es den überhaupt?
Eric Michael Johnson meint nein (I, II, III):
What all of this suggests, quite obviously, is that “social Darwinism” had very little Darwinism in it. What is more likely to have occurred is that, because Darwin was the most famous naturalist of the nineteenth century, any ideas that were associated with evolution (whether based on his theory or not) were lumped togeth…er and labeled “Darwinian.” However, as the second and third categorical objections will emphasize, the entire label itself may have very little explanatory power.
Ähnliche Beiträge:
- Was die Presse den Papst fragen sollte, February 13, 2009 | By Martin Riexinger
- Kapitalismus und Aufklärung, January 22, 2009 | By Martin Riexinger
- Und nochmal: Darwin in der Türkei (Update), March 17, 2009 | By Martin Riexinger
- Don’t mess with Darwin!, November 3, 2009 | By Martin Riexinger
- Darwin-Jubiläum: Türkei, Arabische Welt, Pakistan, February 22, 2009 | By Martin Riexinger
- Protest gegen Geschichtsdokumentation, January 13, 2009 | By Martin Riexinger
- Der Vatikan lädt zum Darwin-Jubiläum,, February 23, 2009 | By Martin Riexinger
- 140 Jahre nach Darwin, August 16, 2006 | By Michael Kreutz
Naja ja….
Und was denkst du?
Das man besser von z.B. Spencerismus reden sollte.